People v Greeman

People v Greeman 2010 NY Slip Op 07269 [77 AD3d 481] October 14, 2010 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, December 15, 2010

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Edward Greeman, Appellant.

—[*1] Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Jody Ratner of counsel), for appellant.

Edward Greeman, appellant pro se.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Sean T. Masson of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene R. Silverman, J.), rendered February 7, 2008, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a forged instrument in the second degree and resisting arrest, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 2¼ to 4½ years, unanimously affirmed.

Since defendant's arguments on appeal are significantly different from those he made at trial, he has not preserved his present claims concerning the chain of custody for an altered MetroCard and the destruction of allegedly exculpatory evidence, and we decline to review them in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject them on the merits. There was a proper chain of custody for the MetroCard at issue (see People v Julian, 41 NY2d 340, 343 [1977]), and the record refutes defendant's claim to the contrary. Defendant was not prejudiced when the arresting officer discarded a stack of MetroCards he also found in defendant's possession, since their exculpatory value was purely speculative (see People v Scott, 309 AD2d 573 [2003], lv denied 2 NY3d 806 [2004]).

We have considered and rejected defendant's pro se claims. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Nardelli, DeGrasse, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.