Matter of IDS Prop. Cas. Ins. Co. v Wynter
Annotate this CaseIn the Matter of IDS Property Casualty Insurance Co., Appellant,
v
Charles Wynter, Respondent.
—[*1] DeCicco, Gibbons & McNamara, P.C., New York (Phillip A. DeCicco and Daniel E. DeCicco of counsel), for appellant.
Robert P. Sharron & Associates, P.C., New York (Robert P. Sharron of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie S. Lowenstein, Special Referee), entered on or about February 26, 2010, which denied petitioner's application to stay arbitration of respondent's uninsured motorist claim, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The record establishes that, at the time of the accident respondent was a passenger in an uninsured motor vehicle. He and the driver of the vehicle, a fellow employee, were on their way to a store where the driver intended to carry out a personal errand unrelated to work. Since respondent and the driver were not acting within the scope of their employment, workers' compensation, if it is a remedy, is not respondent's exclusive remedy (see Workers' Compensation Law § 29 [6]; Macchirole v Giamboi, 97 NY2d 147, 150 [2001]). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Andrias, Catterson, Renwick and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.