Matter of Milazzo v Hamerschlag

Annotate this Case
Matter of Milazzo v Hamerschlag 2010 NY Slip Op 04521 [73 AD3d 666] May 27, 2010 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 30, 2010

In the Matter of Peter G. Milazzo, Appellant,
v
Leslie Hamerschlag, Respondent.

—[*1] Peter M. Levine, New York, for appellant.

Jack F. Scherer, P.C., New York (Ahmed A. Massoud of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered January 13, 2010, awarding petitioner the total sum of $154,330.46 against respondent Leslie Hamerschlag, and bringing up for review an order, same court and Justice, entered December 31, 2009, which found the value of petitioner's shares in the subject business to be $125,000, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The evidence of a recent arm's length offer to purchase the subject business for an amount that petitioner calculated would yield $125,000 for his shares and petitioner's willingness to accept the $125,000 supports the court's determination of the value of petitioner's shares (see Matter of Pace Photographers [Rosen], 71 NY2d 737, 748 [1988]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Acosta and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.