People v Abraham

Annotate this Case
People v Abraham 2010 NY Slip Op 04052 [73 AD3d 503] May 11, 2010 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 30, 2010

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Earl Abraham, Appellant.

—[*1] Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Bruce D. Austern of counsel), for appellant.

Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., District Attorney, New York (Eleanor J. Ostrow of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered on February 10, 2009, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree (two counts), attempted burglary in the second degree and criminal trespass in the second degree (two counts), and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to an aggregate term of 23 years, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence is unpreserved, and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we also reject it on the merits. We further find that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There was ample evidence, including surveillance videotapes, to establish the intent element of the burglary and attempted burglary charges.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur—Tom, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, DeGrasse and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.