Green v Fairway Operating Corp.

Annotate this Case
Green v Fairway Operating Corp. 2010 NY Slip Op 03481 [72 AD3d 613] April 29, 2010 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, June 9, 2010

Rosa Green, Appellant,
v
Fairway Operating Corp. et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

—[*1] Steven M. Weinstein, Plainview, for appellant.

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker LLP, New York (Judy C. Selmeci of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter B. Tolub, J.), entered January 14, 2009, which, in an action for personal injuries sustained in a slip and fall in defendants-respondents' (defendants) supermarket, denied plaintiff's motion to vacate a prior order that had granted defendants' motion for summary judgment upon plaintiff's default, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff fails to show a meritorious cause of action (see Kalisch v Maple Trade Fin. Corp., 35 AD3d 291 [2006]). In order to establish a meritorious cause of action, the affidavit of her nonparty witness who accompanied her to the supermarket was essential. The affidavit of plaintiff's witness, purportedly sworn to in the Dominican Republic, lacks the certificate of conformity (Real Property Law § 301-a) required by CPLR 2309 (c), and therefore is not properly before the Court (see Matter of Elizabeth R.E. v Doundley A.E., 44 AD3d 332 [2007]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, DeGrasse, Abdus-Salaam and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.