Banach v Dedalus Found., Inc.
Annotate this CaseJoan Banach, Respondent,
v
The Dedalus Foundation, Inc., Appellant.
—[*1] Pryor Cashman LLP, New York (Perry M. Amsellem of counsel), for appellant.
Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady LLP, New York (Sarah Netburn of counsel), for respondent.
Appeals from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Doris Ling-Cohan, J.), entered October 28, 2009, which vacated a stay of disclosure and directed immediate discovery, and order, same court and Justice, entered November 24, 2009, wherein the Justice recused herself from the matter, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as taken from nonappealable orders.
The discovery order, issued after a discovery conference, is not appealable as of right (Sidelev v Tsal-Tsalko, 52 AD3d 398 [2008]). Also, the court's sua sponte recusal order is not appealable as of right because it did not decide a motion made on notice (see Sholes v Meagher, 100 NY2d 333 [2003]). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Moskowitz, Freedman, Richter and RomÁn, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.