Matter of Jovany Isaac Benjamin M.

Annotate this Case
Matter of Jovany Isaac Benjamin M. 2007 NY Slip Op 09951 [46 AD3d 374] December 18, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, February 13, 2008

In the Matter of Jovany Isaac Benjamin M., a Child Alleged to be Permanently Neglected. Joyce M., Also Known as Kim T., Appellant; The Children's Aid Society, Respondent.

—[*1] Louise Belulovich, New York City, for appellant.

Rosin Steinhagen Mendel, New York City (Douglas H. Reiniger of counsel), for respondent.

Tamara A. Steckler, The Legal Aid Society, New York City (Lisa B. Freedman of counsel), Law Guardian.

Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Carol Stokinger, J.), entered on or about December 12, 2005, which, upon a finding of permanent neglect, terminated respondent mother's parental rights and committed custody and guardianship of the subject child to petitioner and the Commissioner of the Administration for Children's Services for the purpose of adoption, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Clear and convincing evidence supported the court's determination that respondent mother permanently neglected her child by failing to plan for his future (see Social Services Law § 384-b [7] [a]; Matter of Shareal Stacey S., 17 AD3d 251 [2005]). Although the agency diligently endeavored to encourage a meaningful relationship between mother and child by, inter alia, arranging for visitation referring respondent for services and providing her guidance in finding suitable housing, respondent failed to offer a viable plan for the child's future (see Matter of Star Leslie W., 63 NY2d 136 [1984]). A fair preponderance of the evidence demonstrated that [*2]termination of her parental rights so as to facilitate adoption, rather than suspending judgment, was in the child's best interests (Matter of Maryline A., 22 AD3d 227 [2005]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Williams, McGuire and Kavanagh, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.