People v Reyes

Annotate this Case
People v Reyes 2007 NY Slip Op 09510 [45 AD3d 499] November 29, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 16, 2008

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Cecilio Reyes, Appellant.

—[*1] Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York City (Gayle Pollack of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Richard L. Sullivan of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy L. Kahn, J.), entered on or about May 5, 2006, which denied defendant's motion for resentencing pursuant to the 2005 Drug Law Reform Act, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant's motion on the ground that he was less than three years from his parole eligibility date when he filed the motion (see People v Bautista, 26 AD3d 230 [2006], appeal dismissed 7 NY3d 838 [2006]). Since defendant was clearly ineligible, as a matter of law, for resentencing, there was no reason for the court to assign counsel or conduct a hearing (see People v Santana, 44 AD3d 340 [2007]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Friedman, Williams and Buckley, JJ. [See 12 Misc 3d 1195(A), 2006 NY Slip Op 51584(U).]

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.