Matter of David B.

Annotate this Case
Matter of David B. 2007 NY Slip Op 08869 [45 AD3d 396] November 15, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 16, 2008

In the Matter of David B., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent, Appellant.

—[*1] Howard M. Simms, New York City, for appellant.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Marta Ross of counsel), for presentment agency.

Order of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Susan R. Larabee, J.), entered on or about August 29, 2006, which adjudicated appellant a juvenile delinquent, upon a fact-finding determination that he committed acts which, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of attempted assault in the second degree, menacing in the third degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and placed him on probation for a period of 12 months, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There is no basis for disturbing the court's determinations concerning credibility (see People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). The evidence credited by the court established each of the charges, and disproved appellant's justification defense, beyond a reasonable doubt. The record does not support appellant's assertion that the court misunderstood or misapplied the proper standard of proof regarding the defense of justification. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Marlow, Williams, Buckley and Malone, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.