Lucente v Riverbay Corp.

Annotate this Case
Lucente v Riverbay Corp. 2007 NY Slip Op 08772 [45 AD3d 365] November 13, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, January 16, 2008

John Lucente, Respondent,
v
Riverbay Corporation et al., Appellant, et al., Defendant. (And a Third-Party Action.)

—[*1] Armienti, DeBellis & Whiten, LLP, New York City (Vanessa M. Corchia of counsel), for appellant.

Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & De Cicco, New York City (Brian J. Isaac of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal, as limited by the briefs, from that part of the order of Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sallie Manzanet-Daniels, J.), entered on or about December 1, 2006, which denied defendants' motion to consolidate this action with another pending in Bronx County, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as moot.

This court dismissed Viera v Riverbay Corp. (44 AD3d 577 [1st Dept 2007]), the action with which defendants seek consolidation. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Marlow, Buckley, Catterson and McGuire, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.