Vasquez v Hernandez
Annotate this CaseHector Vasquez, Respondent,
v
Pablo Hernandez, Defendant, and Aristedes Rivera, Appellant.
—[*1] Richard T. Lau & Associates, Jericho (Kathleen E. Fioretti of counsel), for appellant.
Trolman, Glaser & Lichtman, P.C., New York (Michael T. Altman of counsel), for respondent.
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lucy Billings, J.), entered May 11, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from, denied so much of defendant Rivera's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against him, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted in its entirety, and the complaint dismissed against Rivera. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
The evidence submitted with Rivera's motion established that he had the right of way when defendant Hernandez made a left-hand turn in front of his vehicle. Since plaintiff offered no competent evidence of Rivera's negligence for the occurrence of the accident, summary judgment should have been granted, dismissing the complaint against that defendant (see Murchison v Incognoli, 5 AD3d 271 [2004]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Sullivan, Catterson, McGuire and Malone, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.