Matter of Suarez v Byrne

Annotate this Case
Matter of Suarez v Byrne 2007 NY Slip Op 04577 [40 AD3d 546] May 31, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Monday, October 1, 2007

In the Matter of Santos Suarez, Petitioner,
v
John Byrne et al., Respondents.

—[*1] Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Mark W. Zeno of counsel), for petitioner.

Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Peter D. Coddington of counsel), for Robert T. Johnson, respondent. Application for an order pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules denied and the petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements (see People v Suarez, 40 AD3d 143 [2007]). All concur. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Marlow, Nardelli, Buckley and Kavanagh, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.