People v Adames

Annotate this Case
People v Adames 2007 NY Slip Op 02474 [38 AD3d 385] March 22, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, May 9, 2007

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Evan Adames, Appellant.

—[*1] Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (Carol A. Zeldin of counsel), for appellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Meredith Boylan of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Michael A. Corriero, J.), rendered June 27, 2006, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to a term of five years, with five years' postrelease supervision, unanimously affirmed.

We perceive no basis for reducing defendant's term of postrelease supervision. For the reasons stated in our decision in People v Lemos (34 AD3d 343 [2006]), we reject defendant's argument that the court unlawfully imposed a mandatory surcharge and fees when it did so in writing, without including the surcharge and fees in its oral pronouncement of sentence. Concur—Tom, J.P., Andrias, Sullivan, Williams and Gonzalez, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.