Gonchar v National Assn. of Sec. Dealers, Inc.
Annotate this CaseAndrew Paul Gonchar et al., Appellants,
v
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., et al., Respondents, and Martin H. Kaplan, Esq., Proposed Intervenor-Appellant.
—[*1] Gusrae, Kaplan, Bruno & Nusbaum PLLC, New York (Brian D. Graifman of counsel), for appellants. Terri L. Reicher, Washington, DC, for respondents.
Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol R. Edmead, J.), entered February 7, 2006, which dismissed this proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit respondent Hearing Officer from barring petitioners' use of subpoenas in a National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) disciplinary proceeding and denied proposed intervenor's motion to intervene, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.
The disciplinary proceeding has concluded. Petitioners may appeal the Hearing Officer's order internally through the NASD. Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Sullivan, Williams and Catterson, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.