People v Garcia

Annotate this Case
People v Garcia 2007 NY Slip Op 01493 [37 AD3d 355] February 22, 2007 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. As corrected through Wednesday, April 11, 2007

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Carlos Garcia, Appellant.

—[*1] Goldstein & Weinstein, Bronx (David J. Goldstein of counsel), for appellant. Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Eldar Mayouhas of counsel), for respondent.

Judgments, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Robert A. Sackett, J.), rendered March 7, 2005, convicting defendant, upon his pleas of guilty, of two counts of assault in the first degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of eight and five years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea (see People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520 [1978]). The record establishes that the plea was voluntary (see People v Seeber, 4 NY3d 780 [2005]), notwithstanding the fact that it was linked to the disposition of the codefendant, who was defendant's brother (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 544-547 [1993]). There was nothing coercive about the court's advice to defendant about his possible sentencing exposure and the inherent hazards of a trial. Moreover, defendant received effective assistance of counsel in connection with his plea (see People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404 [1995]; see also Hill v Lockhart, 474 US 52 [1985]). When counsel warned defendant, in graphic terms, that going to trial would be suicidal, he was offering his professional opinion on the strength of the case and his sound advice to plead guilty (see e.g. People v Hines, 267 AD2d 17 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 921 [2000]). We have considered and rejected defendant's remaining claims. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Saxe, Marlow, Nardelli and Gonzalez, JJ.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.