McCagg v Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
Annotate this Case
McCagg v Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
2007 NY Slip Op 00054 [36 AD3d 424]
January 4, 2007
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
As corrected through Wednesday, March 14, 2007
Brin McCagg, Respondent-Appellant,
v
Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP et al., Defendants, and Alan Clingman, Appellant-Respondent.
Brin McCagg, Respondent-Appellant,
v
Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP et al., Defendants, and Alan Clingman, Appellant-Respondent.
—[*1] Farber Pappalardo & Carbonari, White Plains (Eugene I. Farber of counsel), for appellant-respondent. McLauglin & Stern, LLP, New York (Paul H. Levinson of counsel), for respondent-appellant.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard J. Fried, J.), entered September 26, 2005, unanimously affirmed for the reasons stated by Fried, J., without costs or disbursements. No opinion. Order filed. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Marlow, McGuire and Malone, JJ.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
