KAMIE KENDALL v. HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, INC

Annotate this Case

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-0

KAMIE KENDALL,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

HOFFMAN-LA ROCHE, INC. and

ROCHE LABORATORIES INC.,

Defendants-Appellants.

____________________________________

June 16, 2016

 

Argued February 8, 2016 Decided

Before Judges Sabatino, Accurso and Suter.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Atlantic County, Docket No. L-8213-05.

Paul W. Schmidt (Covington & Burling, LLP) of the New York and District of Columbia bars, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellants (Gibbons P.C. and Mr. Schmidt, attorneys; Michelle M. Bufano and Mr. Schmidt, of counsel and on the briefs.)

David R. Buchanan argued the cause for respondents (Seeger Weiss, LLP, attorneys; Mr. Buchanan, Mary Jane Bass (Beggs & Lane) of the Florida bar, admitted pro hac vice, and Michael D. Hook (Hook Bolton) of the Florida bar, admitted pro hac vice, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

The court is advised that the matter has been amicably resolved, the parties have stipulated to the dismissal of the appeal, and the appeal is dismissed without prejudice and without costs.

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.