FRANK BRIZAK v. MARGATE TENANTS CORPORATION
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-0
FRANK BRIZAK,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
MARGATE TENANTS CORPORATION,
Respondent-Respondent.
________________________________________________________________
November 13, 2014
Submitted November 6, 2014 - Decided
Before Judges Maven and Carroll.
On appeal from the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce, Division of Workers' Compensation, Case No. 2006-15.
Capizola, Pancari, Lapham & Fralinger, P.A., attorneys for appellant (Michael D. Capizola, on the brief),
Respondent has not filed a brief.
PER CURIAM
Prior to the date scheduled for oral argument, the parties advised us that this matter had been amicably resolved and that a stipulation of dismissal was being prepared. The stipulation of dismissal having been filed, this appeal is dismissed as moot.
Dismissed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.