FRANK BRIZAK v. MARGATE TENANTS CORPORATION

Annotate this Case

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-0

FRANK BRIZAK,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v.

MARGATE TENANTS CORPORATION,

Respondent-Respondent.

________________________________________________________________

November 13, 2014

 

Submitted November 6, 2014 - Decided

Before Judges Maven and Carroll.

On appeal from the New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce, Division of Workers' Compensation, Case No. 2006-15.

Capizola, Pancari, Lapham & Fralinger, P.A., attorneys for appellant (Michael D. Capizola, on the brief),

Respondent has not filed a brief.

PER CURIAM

Prior to the date scheduled for oral argument, the parties advised us that this matter had been amicably resolved and that a stipulation of dismissal was being prepared. The stipulation of dismissal having been filed, this appeal is dismissed as moot.

Dismissed.

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.