VATCHE ASLANIAN v. IAN C. DORIS
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-5614-09T2
VATCHE ASLANIAN and ANNA
ASLANIAN,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
IAN C. DORIS, JOSE PANCHI,
KENNETH DESIDERIO and MICHAEL
CORCORAN,
Defendants-Respondents.
________________________________
December 15, 2011
Argued November 28, 2011 - Decided
Before Judges Parrillo, Grall and
Skillman.
On appeal from Superior Court of New
Jersey, Law Division, Bergen County,
Docket No. L-6202-09.
Richard J. Abrahamsen argued the cause
for appellants.
Diana Powell McGovern argued the cause
for respondent Ian C. Doris (Zimmerer,
Murray, Conyngham & Kunzier, attorneys;
Robert Zimmerer, of counsel and on the
brief).
Nancy Crosta Landale argued the
cause for respondents Jose Panchi
and Michael Corcoran (Farkas &
Donohue, attorneys; Ms. Landale, on
the brief).
Jerald J. Howarth argued the cause
for respondent Kenneth Desiderio
(Howarth & Associates, LLC, attorneys;
Mr. Howarth and Purnima D. Ramlakhan,
on the brief).
PER CURIAM
Plaintiffs and defendants are neighbors, and this appeal arises from a dispute about an annual block party that plaintiffs have opposed since its inception. On this appeal, plaintiffs seek reversal of an order granting defendants summary judgment on a civil complaint seeking damages and punitive damages on claims of negligence, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, false imprisonment and malicious prosecution. We affirm substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Harz in her thorough oral opinions of February 5 and June 11, 2010.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.