TERESITA CRUZ v. HECTOR F. POTOSI
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-5697-08T15697-08T1
TERESITA CRUZ, Administratrix of the
ESTATE OF NOE E. CRUZ and TERESITA,
Plaintiffs,
v.
HECTOR F. POTOSI, TAREK O. AZIZ,
NANCY AZIZ, ESMERALDO F. PAYUYO,
JEFFREY PAYUYO, and MAXON MAZDA HYUNDAI,
GALLOPING HILL RESTAURANT, OFF SIDES
BAR & RESTAURANT and NARDONES GOGO CLUB,
Defendants.
_______________________________________
TAREK AZIZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
ESMERALDO E. PAYUYO, JEFFREY PAYUYO,
and HECTOR F. POTOSI,
Defendants.
________________________________________
RICHARD BENITEZ,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
TAREK AZIZ, NANCY AZIZ, HECTOR POTOSI,
ESMERALDO PAYUYO, MAXON MAZDA HYUNDAI,
NJ DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES, and
NJ DIVISION OF MEDICAL ASSISTANCE
AND HEALTH SERVICES,
Defendants,
and
GALLOPING HILL RESTAURANT, OFF SIDES
BAR & RESTAURANT and NARDONES GOGO CLUB,
Defendants-Respondents.
________________________________________
Submitted July 6, 2010 - Decided
Before Judges Cuff and Fuentes.
On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey,
Law Division, Hudson County, Docket Nos.
L-5258-05, L-0802-06, and L-0071-07.
Nelson, Fromer & Crocco, attorneys for
appellant (Charles M. Crocco, of counsel and
on the brief).
Grossman & Heavey, P.C., attorneys for respondent
Galloping Hill Restaurant (Ronald L. Lueddeke, Jr.,
on the brief).
Triarsi, Betancourt, Walsh & Wukovits, L.L.C,
attorneys for respondent Off Sides Bar &
Restaurant (Howard P. Lesnik, on the brief).
PER CURIAM
On December 21, 2004, Tarek Aziz was involved in a head-on collision with a car owned by Hector Potosi, which was driven by either Potosi or Noe Cruz. Plaintiff Richard Benitez was a passenger in the car driven by Aziz. Cruz was killed as a result of the accident and plaintiff suffered serious injuries. At the time of the accident, Potosi's blood alcohol content (BAC) was approximately .22; Cruz's BAC was .31. Both of these BAC readings are more than twice the legal limit of intoxication as defined by N.J.S.A. 39:4-50.
In addition to naming Potosi as a defendant in this case, plaintiff also brought a dram shop cause of action against a number of establishments that may have dispensed alcohol to Potosi or Cruz on the night of the accident while they were visibly intoxicated. In addition to this civil action, Potosi also faces criminal charges arising from this accident. Thus, when questioned by plaintiff in the course of conducting discovery in this civil suit, Potosi invoked his constitutional right against self-incrimination concerning the details of the accident, including his possible involvement as the driver.
Faced with the inability to identify who was actually driving the car at the time of the accident, plaintiff sought to compel Potosi to testify, to compel the Hudson County Prosecutor's Office to grant Potosi immunity, or in the alternative, for the court to place the case on the inactive list until the statute of limitations on Potosi's potential criminal charges expires. By order dated December 21, 2007, Judge Bariso denied plaintiff's motion in all respects. Thereafter, by order dated June 10, 2009, Judge Curran granted the establishments' summary judgment motions and dismissed plaintiff's cause of action against them all.
Plaintiff now appeals arguing that Judge Bariso abused his discretion in failing to place this matter on the inactive list. We reject this argument and affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Bariso in his oral opinion delivered from the bench on December 21, 2007. We note that Potosi is still facing possible criminal prosecution for causing Cruz's death. Since there is no statute of limitations pertaining to these crimes, prosecution for aggravated manslaughter, N.J.S.A. 2C:11-4a(1) or (2), and reckless manslaughter, N.J.S.A. 2C:11-4b(1) or (2), "may be commenced at any time." N.J.S.A. 2C:1-6a(1). Plaintiff's application would thus potentially require the court to keep this case on the inactive list in perpetuity.
Affirmed.
Improperly designated as Offsides Gogo Club.
(continued)
(continued)
4
A-5697-08T1
July 23, 2010
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.