TIMOTHY SUTER v. BOROUGH OF PAULSBORO

Annotate this Case

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-2069-08T22069-08T2

TIMOTHY SUTER,

Plaintiff-Appellant/

Cross-Respondent,

v.

BOROUGH OF PAULSBORO, BOROUGH

OF PAULSBORO COUNCIL, and

BOROUGH OF PAULSBORO

POLICE DEPARTMENT,

Defendants-Respondents/

Cross-Appellants.

________________________________________________________________

 

Submitted March 1, 2010 - Decided

Before Judges R. B. Coleman and Baxter.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Gloucester County, Docket No. L-851-04.

Alterman & Associates, LLC, attorneys for appellant/cross-respondent (Christopher A. Gray, on the briefs).

Barker, Scott & Gelfand, P.C., attorneys for respondents/cross-appellants (Todd J. Gelfand, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

This matter having been amicably adjusted and the parties

 
having stipulated to the dismissal of the appeal and cross-appeal, it is hereby ordered that the appeal and cross-appeal are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

(continued)

(continued)

2

A-2069-08T2

April 28, 2010

 


Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.