TIMOTHY SUTER v. BOROUGH OF PAULSBORO
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-2069-08T22069-08T2
TIMOTHY SUTER,
Plaintiff-Appellant/
Cross-Respondent,
v.
BOROUGH OF PAULSBORO, BOROUGH
OF PAULSBORO COUNCIL, and
BOROUGH OF PAULSBORO
POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendants-Respondents/
Cross-Appellants.
________________________________________________________________
Submitted March 1, 2010 - Decided
Before Judges R. B. Coleman and Baxter.
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Gloucester County, Docket No. L-851-04.
Alterman & Associates, LLC, attorneys for appellant/cross-respondent (Christopher A. Gray, on the briefs).
Barker, Scott & Gelfand, P.C., attorneys for respondents/cross-appellants (Todd J. Gelfand, on the brief).
PER CURIAM
This matter having been amicably adjusted and the parties
having stipulated to the dismissal of the appeal and cross-appeal, it is hereby ordered that the appeal and cross-appeal are dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
(continued)
(continued)
2
A-2069-08T2
April 28, 2010
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.