IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION OF HARTZ / 10 ENTERPRISE AVE

Annotate this Case

(NOTE: The status of this decision is .)
 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-4683-07T34683-07T3

IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION

OF HARTZ / 10 ENTERPRISE AVE.

________________________________

 

Submitted June 3, 2009 - Decided

Before Judges Parrillo and Lihotz.

On appeal from Final Decision of the New Jersey Meadowlands Commission, Agency File No. 08-263.

Johnson & Johnson, attorneys for appellant, Town

of Secaucus (John M. Johnson, of counsel and on

the brief).

Anne Milgram, Attorney General, attorney for

respondent, New Jersey Meadowlands Commission (Lewis A. Scheindlin, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Christine Piatek, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

Law Offices of Dennis A. Maycher, P.C., attorneys for intervenor, Secaucus Board of Education (Mr. Maycher, of counsel and on the brief).

Horowitz, Rubino & Patton, attorneys for Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc. (D. Mark Leonard, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

 
The court being advised by the attorneys for the parties in the above matter that the issues in dispute have been amicably resolved, the appeal is accordingly dismissed with prejudice and without costs to either party.

(continued)

(continued)

2

A-4683-07T3

June 23, 2009

 


Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.