VENKATA RAJU and CHANTI, LLC v. 315 WILLOW AVENUE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION

Annotate this Case

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-2931-08T32931-08T3

VENKATA RAJU and CHANTI, LLC,

Plaintiffs-Appellants/

Cross-Respondents,

v.

315 WILLOW AVENUE CONDOMINIUM

ASSOCIATION, and DOUGLAS AMSTER,

Defendants-Respondents/

Cross-Appellants,

and

BERMEO PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CORP.,

Defendant-Respondent.

_______________

DOUGLAS AMSTER,

Plaintiff,

v.

VENKATA RAJU, CHANTI, L.L.C., and

315 WILLOW AVENUE CONDOMINIUM

ASSOCIATION, INC.,

Defendants.

___________________________________

 

Submitted: November 12, 2009 - Decided:

Before Judges Stern, Sabatino and Newman.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Hudson County, Docket No. L-2680-07.

Durkin & Durkin, LLP, attorneys for appellants/cross-respondents (Robert S. Cosgrove, on the brief).

Farkas & Donohue, LLC, attorneys for respondent/cross-appellant 315 Willow Avenue Condominium Association (Charles E. Murray, III, of counsel and on the brief).

Zimmerer, Murray, Conyngham & Kunzier, attorneys for respondent Bermeo Property Management Corp. (Frank J. Kunzier, of counsel and on the brief; Joseph R. Haftek, Jr., on the brief).

Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, attorneys for respondent/cross-appellant Douglas Amster (Kurt W. Krauss, of counsel and on the brief).

PER CURIAM

 
The parties having advised that the dispute has been amicably settled, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.

(continued)

(continued)

2

A-2931-08T3

November 18, 2009

 


Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.