VENKATA RAJU and CHANTI, LLC v. 315 WILLOW AVENUE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-2931-08T32931-08T3
VENKATA RAJU and CHANTI, LLC,
Plaintiffs-Appellants/
Cross-Respondents,
v.
315 WILLOW AVENUE CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION, and DOUGLAS AMSTER,
Defendants-Respondents/
Cross-Appellants,
and
BERMEO PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CORP.,
Defendant-Respondent.
_______________
DOUGLAS AMSTER,
Plaintiff,
v.
VENKATA RAJU, CHANTI, L.L.C., and
315 WILLOW AVENUE CONDOMINIUM
ASSOCIATION, INC.,
Defendants.
___________________________________
Submitted: November 12, 2009 - Decided:
Before Judges Stern, Sabatino and Newman.
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Hudson County, Docket No. L-2680-07.
Durkin & Durkin, LLP, attorneys for appellants/cross-respondents (Robert S. Cosgrove, on the brief).
Farkas & Donohue, LLC, attorneys for respondent/cross-appellant 315 Willow Avenue Condominium Association (Charles E. Murray, III, of counsel and on the brief).
Zimmerer, Murray, Conyngham & Kunzier, attorneys for respondent Bermeo Property Management Corp. (Frank J. Kunzier, of counsel and on the brief; Joseph R. Haftek, Jr., on the brief).
Wilson, Elser, Moskowitz, Edelman & Dicker, LLP, attorneys for respondent/cross-appellant Douglas Amster (Kurt W. Krauss, of counsel and on the brief).
PER CURIAM
The parties having advised that the dispute has been amicably settled, the appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without costs.
(continued)
(continued)
2
A-2931-08T3
November 18, 2009
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.