MARC L. KAHN, M.D. v. RALPH H. HOOD
Annotate this CaseNOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-1294-08T11294-08T1
MARC L. KAHN, M.D., and
CYNTHIA KAHN,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
vs.
RALPH H. HOOD, individually
and as an employee of Shirts
N' Things, Inc.,
Defendant,
and
SHIRTS N' THINGS, INC.,
Defendant-Respondent.
__________________________________
Submitted: October 28, 2009 - Decided:
Before Judges Cuff and Waugh.
On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Cape May County, Docket No. L-394-06.
Grimes & Grimes, L.L.C., attorneys for appellants (Joseph P. Grimes, on the briefs).
Tompkins, McGuire, Wachenfeld & Barry, LLP, attorneys for respondent SNT, Inc., t/a Shirts N' Things, improperly pled as Shirts N' Things, Inc. (Richard F. Connors, Jr., of counsel and on the brief; Sarah A. Ryan, on the brief).
PER CURIAM
Plaintiffs Marc L. Kahn and Cynthia Kahn filed a complaint seeking compensatory and punitive damages from defendants Ralph H. Hood and Shirts N' Things, Inc. following a physical altercation between plaintiffs and Hood. Plaintiffs appeal from a May 9, 2008 order granting summary judgment to defendant Shirts N' Things and dismissing plaintiffs' complaint as to it.
We affirm substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Darryl F. Todd, Sr., in his May 9, 2008 opinion.
Affirmed.
The claim against Ralph H. Hood was settled on September 5, 2008.
We do not address the issue of authority to bring the motion for summary judgment on behalf of the corporate entity. It is clear from the transcript of oral argument that the individual and corporate defendants were represented by different counsel designated by different insurance carriers, who had differing views on liability. Because Hood and his personal insurance carrier settled with plaintiffs, the issue is moot and plaintiffs have no standing to raise this issue on appeal.
(continued)
(continued)
2
A-1294-08T1
November 4, 2009
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.