RYAN WALSH, et al. v. THE STOP AND SHOP COMPANIES, INC., et al.

Annotate this Case

(NOTE: The status of this decision is .)
 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-0073-04T20073-04T2

RYAN WALSH, by his G/A/L

LAURA WALSH, and LAURA WALSH,

Individually,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

JAC PAC FOODS, LTD.,

Defendant/Third-Party

Plaintiff,

and

THE STOP AND SHOP COMPANIES,

INC.,

Defendant-Respondent/

Fourth-Party Defendant,

and

MOYER PACKING COMPANY, INC.,

Defendant-Respondent/

Third-Party Plaintiff/

Fourth-Party Defendant,

and

TAYLOR PACKING COMPANY, INC.,

Defendant-Respondent/

Third-Party Plaintiff/

Third-Party Defendant/

Fourth-Party-Defendant,

v.

SUSAN MITCHELL,

Third-Party Defendant/

Fourth-Party Plaintiff,

v.

PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY

COMPANY,

Fourth-Party Defendants.

______________________________________

JAC PAC FOODS, LTD.,

Third-Party Plaintiff,

v.

TAYLOR PACKING COMPANY, INC.

and SUSAN MITCHELL,

Third-Party Defendants.

______________________________________

 

Submitted March 7, 2006 - Decided

Before Judges Skillman, Payne and Sabatino.

On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County, Docket No. L-2596-01.

Gill & Chamas, attorneys for appellant (Peter Chamas, on the brief).

Golden, Rothschild, Spagnola, Lundell, Levitt & Boylan, attorneys for respondent, Moyer Packing Company (Ronald S. Levitt, of counsel; Eric S. Schlesinger, on the brief).

Martin, Gunn & Martin, attorneys for respondent Taylor Packing Company, Inc. (Bruce M. Gunn, on the brief).

Velardo & Velardo, attorneys for respondent The Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.

PER CURIAM

 
The parties having advised us that this case has been settled subject to the trial court's approval of the settlement on behalf of the infant plaintiff, the appeal is dismissed and the case is remanded to the trial court to review the proposed settlement. Jurisdiction is not retained.

(continued)

(continued)

3

A-0073-04T2

March 21, 2006

 


Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.