RYAN WALSH, et al. v. THE STOP AND SHOP COMPANIES, INC., et al.
Annotate this Case(NOTE: The status of this decision is .)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
DOCKET NO. A-0073-04T20073-04T2
RYAN WALSH, by his G/A/L
LAURA WALSH, and LAURA WALSH,
Individually,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
JAC PAC FOODS, LTD.,
Defendant/Third-Party
Plaintiff,
and
THE STOP AND SHOP COMPANIES,
INC.,
Defendant-Respondent/
Fourth-Party Defendant,
and
MOYER PACKING COMPANY, INC.,
Defendant-Respondent/
Third-Party Plaintiff/
Fourth-Party Defendant,
and
TAYLOR PACKING COMPANY, INC.,
Defendant-Respondent/
Third-Party Plaintiff/
Third-Party Defendant/
Fourth-Party-Defendant,
v.
SUSAN MITCHELL,
Third-Party Defendant/
Fourth-Party Plaintiff,
v.
PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY AND CASUALTY
COMPANY,
Fourth-Party Defendants.
______________________________________
JAC PAC FOODS, LTD.,
Third-Party Plaintiff,
v.
TAYLOR PACKING COMPANY, INC.
and SUSAN MITCHELL,
Third-Party Defendants.
______________________________________
Submitted March 7, 2006 - Decided
Before Judges Skillman, Payne and Sabatino.
On appeal from Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County, Docket No. L-2596-01.
Gill & Chamas, attorneys for appellant (Peter Chamas, on the brief).
Golden, Rothschild, Spagnola, Lundell, Levitt & Boylan, attorneys for respondent, Moyer Packing Company (Ronald S. Levitt, of counsel; Eric S. Schlesinger, on the brief).
Martin, Gunn & Martin, attorneys for respondent Taylor Packing Company, Inc. (Bruce M. Gunn, on the brief).
Velardo & Velardo, attorneys for respondent The Stop & Shop Companies, Inc.
PER CURIAM
The parties having advised us that this case has been settled subject to the trial court's approval of the settlement on behalf of the infant plaintiff, the appeal is dismissed and the case is remanded to the trial court to review the proposed settlement. Jurisdiction is not retained.
(continued)
(continued)
3
A-0073-04T2
March 21, 2006
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.