In rePetition for Disciplinary Action against Alan F. Pendleton, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0121538.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MINNESOTA fiL March 1, 2016 IN SUPREME COURT Om:cEOF API'B.IA'IEca.rs A15-1996 In rePetition for Disciplinary Action against Alan F. Pendleton, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration No. 0121538. ORDER The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility has filed a petition for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Alan F. Pendleton committed professional misconduct warranting public discipline-namely, while serving as a district court judge, failing to maintain residency in the judicial district in which he served; making a knowingly false statement in an affidavit of candidacy; and making misleading statements about his removal as a district court judge in a blog. See Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 7.1, 8.4(c), and 8.4(d). The parties filed a stipulation for discipline. In it, respondent waives his procedural rights under Rule 14, Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), and unconditionally admits the allegations in the petition. The parties jointly recommend that the appropriate discipline is a 90-day suspension. The court has independently reviewed the file and approves the recommended disposition. Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, 1 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. Respondent Alan F. Pendleton is suspended from the practice of law for a minimum of90 days, as of the date ofthis order; 2. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RPLR; 3. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of suspension to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals); 4. Respondent shall be eligible for reinstatement to the practice of law following the expiration of the suspension period provided that, not less than 15 days before the end of the suspension period, respondent files with the Clerk of Appellate Courts and serves upon the Director an affidavit establishing that he is current in continuing legal education requirements, has complied with Rules 24 and 26, RLPR, and has complied with any other conditions for reinstatement imposed by the court; and 5. Within 1 year of the date ofthis order, respondent shall file with the Clerk of Appellate Courts and serve upon the Director proof of successful completion of the professional responsibility portion of the state bar examination. Failure to timely file the required documentation shall result in automatic re-suspension, as provided in Rule 18(e)(3 ), RLPR. Dated: March 1, 2016 BY THE COURT: D Associate Justice 2 GILDEA, C. J., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. 3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
