EDGAR HERNANDEZ V TAYLOR COMMONS LTD PARTNERSHIP
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
EDGAR HERNANDEZ,
UNPUBLISHED
June 29, 2004
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v
No. 247576
Wayne Circuit Court
LC No. 02-205880-NO
TAYLOR COMMONS LTD PARTNERSHIP and
C.O. MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
BORMANS, INC., d/b/a FARMER JACK,
Defendant.
Before: Murphy, P.J., and Jansen and Cooper, JJ.
COOPER, J. (concurring).
Although I must concur in the result of this case, as we are duty bound to follow Lugo v
Ameritech Corp,1 I write separately to urge the Supreme Court to note the logical consequences
of that decision. Under Lugo, the more treacherous the situation (as in this case, the parking lot),
the more open and obvious the defect, the less likelihood that liability will be found. Short of a
thirty-foot pit, property owners are free to continue to maintain these defects to the detriment of
the public. The result in this particular case is that defendant acknowledges that there were
numerous complaints about the condition of the parking lot and the potential for injury. For
public policy purposes, we ought to avoid a situation where it is cheaper for business owners to
defend lawsuits than to repair defective conditions on their land.
/s/ Jessica R. Cooper
1
Lugo v Ameritech Corp, 464 Mich 512; 629 NW2d 384 (2001)
-1-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.