KIRK R VERCNOCKE V RANDALL A STUBBS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
KIRK R. VERCNOCKE and DEBORAH
VERCNOCKE,
UNPUBLISHED
June 15, 2004
Plaintiffs/CounterdefendantsAppellants/Cross-Appellees,
v
RANDALL STUBBS and LORRAINE STUBBS,
No. 245422
Oakland Circuit Court
LC No. 02-038296-CH
Defendants/CounterplaintiffsAppellees/Cross-Appellants.
Before: Fitzgerald, P.J., and Jansen and Talbot, JJ.
JANSEN, J. (concurring).
I concur with the majority opinion. But I write separately to note that I believe this
Court’s opinion in Timmons v DeVoll, unpublished opinion per curiam of the Court of Appeals,
issued February 24, 2004 (Docket Nos. 241507, 249015) provides a better analysis and rationale
for this outcome than the cases cited by the majority. I view the Timmons case as particularly
persuasive, because of the limited case law on point, but note that unpublished opinions are not
binding under the rules of stare decisis. MCR 7.215(C)(1).
/s/ Kathleen Jansen
-1-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
