IN RE COLE-COBB/COBB MINORS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of DAROLD FASSETT, JESSICA
COLE-COBB, and DAVID COBB, Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
April 20, 2001
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
TRACEY COLE,
No. 229539
Kent Circuit Court
Family Division
LC No. 98-199700-NA
Respondent-Appellant,
and
BENEDICT HUCKLEBERRY and DAVID
COBB,
Respondents.
In the Matter of JESSICA COLE-COBB and
DAVID COBB, Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
DAVID L. COBB, SR.,
Respondent-Appellant,
and
TRACEY COLE,
Respondent.
No. 229627
Kent Circuit Court
Family Division
LC No. 98-199700-NA
Before: Talbot, P.J., and Sawyer and F. L. Borchard*, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondents-appellants Tracey Cole and David L. Cobb, Sr., appeal as of right from the
trial court order terminating their parental rights to the minor children under MCL
712A.19b(3)(c)(i) and (g); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(c)(i) and (g). We affirm.
The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination
were established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331,
337; 445 NW2d 161 (1989). Further, the evidence did not show that termination of respondentsappellants’ parental rights was clearly not in the children’s best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5);
MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5); In re Trejo, 462 Mich 341, 356-357; 612 NW2d 407 (2000). Thus,
the trial court did not err in terminating respondents-appellants’ parental rights to the children.
Id.
Affirmed.
/s/ Michael J. Talbot
/s/ David H. Sawyer
/s/ Fred L. Borchard
* Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
