IN RE FLORIP MINORS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of TYLER FLORIP, CHRISTOPHER
FLORIP, TIARA FLORIP, and CHAYLA FLORIP,
Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
February 27, 2001
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
CHERYL FLORIP,
No. 224269
Muskegon Circuit Court
Family Division
LC No. 97-024762-NA
Respondent-Appellant,
and
RODNEY FERRIS and TIMOTHY FERRIS,
Respondents.
Before: Meter, P.J., and Neff and O’Connell, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from the family court order terminating her
parental rights to the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(b)(i), (b)(ii), (c)(i), (g), and (j);
MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(b)(i), (b)(ii), (c)(i), (g), and (j). We affirm.
The family court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination
were established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331,
337; 445 NW2d 161 (1989). Further, the evidence did not show that termination of respondentappellant’s parental rights was clearly not in the children’s best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5);
MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5); In re Trejo, 462 Mich 341, 356-357; 612 NW2d 407 (2000). Thus,
the family court did not err in terminating respondent-appellant’s parental rights to the children.
Id.
Affirmed.
/s/ Patrick M. Meter
/s/ Janet T. Neff
/s/ Peter D. O’Connell
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
