PEOPLE OF MI V CHRISTINE A COHOON
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,
UNPUBLISHED
January 23, 2001
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v
No. 227950
Clinton Circuit Court
LC No. 99-006709-FH
CHRISTINE A. COHOON,
Defendant-Appellant.
Before: Collins, P.J., and Doctoroff and White, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals by delayed leave granted her sentence of five to twenty years in prison
for her plea-based conviction of conspiracy to deliver 50 grams or more but less than 225 grams
of heroin, MCL 333.7401(2)(a)(iii); MSA 14.15(7401)(2)(a)(iii); MCL 750.157a; MSA
28.354(1). We affirm. This appeal is being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR
7.214(E).
Defendant pleaded guilty in exchange for dismissal of all remaining charges and the
prosecution’s agreement pursuant to People v Killebrew, 416 Mich 189; 330 NW2d 834 (1982),
that her minimum term not exceed five years. The prosecution agreed that substantial and
compelling reasons existed to depart downward from the statutorily mandated ten-year minimum
term. MCL 333.7401(4); MSA 14.15(7401)(4).
At sentencing, defendant requested that the court depart further and impose a term of less
than five years. She cited her employment history, her family support, and her attempt to address
her substance abuse problem as reasons for a further downward departure. In addition, defendant
noted that the sentencing guidelines recommended a minimum term range of twelve to thirty
months. She contended that the guidelines themselves constituted a substantial and compelling
reason for a further departure. The trial court found that no further downward departure was
warranted, and sentenced defendant to five to twenty years in prison.
A court may depart downward from a mandated minimum term if it finds on the record
that substantial and compelling reasons exist to do so. MCL 333.7401(4); MSA 14.15(7401)(4).
Substantial and compelling reasons must be objective and verifiable, and can be based on pre- or
post-arrest conduct. People v Fields, 448 Mich 58, 76-78; 528 NW2d 176 (1995). Such factors
include the circumstances that mitigate the defendant’s culpability, and the defendant’s age, prior
-1-
record, and work history. People v Shinholster, 196 Mich App 531, 534; 493 NW2d 502 (1992).
The determination of whether factors constituted substantial and compelling reasons to depart
from a minimum term is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. Fields, supra, 77-78.
Defendant argues that she is entitled to resentencing for the reason that her minimum
term of five years’ is disproportionate to her circumstances and to those of the offense. People v
Milbourn, 435 Mich 630, 636; 461 NW2d 1 (1990). She asserts that the sentencing guidelines,
which recommended a minimum term range of twelve to thirty months, constituted an objective
and verifiable factor that warranted a further downward departure.
We disagree and affirm defendant’s sentence. The offense to which defendant pleaded
guilty, conspiracy to deliver 50 to 225 grams of heroin, carried a statutorily mandated minimum
term of ten years in prison. MCL 333.7401(2)(a)(iii); MSA 14.15(7401)(2)(a)(iii); MCL
750.157a(a); MSA 28.354(1)(a). The trial court agreed that substantial and compelling reasons
existed to depart downward, and imposed a minimum term of five years. Those reasons included
defendant’s extensive cooperation with law enforcement authorities, her work history, her family
support, and her documented efforts to deal with her substance abuse problem. Defendant’s
assertion that the sentencing guidelines provided support for a further downward departure is
without merit. Defendant’s offense was committed prior to January 1, 1999; therefore, the
statutory sentencing guidelines were inapplicable. MCL 769.34(1); MSA 28.1097(3.4)(1). The
judicial sentencing guidelines in effect at the time did not cover the offense of conspiracy to
which defendant pleaded guilty. Application of guidelines by analogy is improper. People v
Laube, 155 Mich App 415, 417; 399 NW2d 545 (1986). Furthermore, by pleading guilty with
knowledge of the five-year sentence via prosecutorial recommendation, defendant demonstrated
her agreement that the sentence was proportionate. People v Cobbs, 443 Mich 276, 285; 505
NW2d 208 (1993). No further downward departure was warranted.
Affirmed.
/s/ Jeffrey G. Collins
/s/ Martin M. Doctoroff
/s/ Helene N. White
-2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.