IN RE MCQUEEN MINORS

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS In the Matter of JONATHAN COLBYALEXANDER MCQUEEN, NICHOLAS ARONGREY MCQUEEN, CASSIDY AMBER RAE MCQUEEN, Minors. FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY, UNPUBLISHED August 11, 2000 Petitioner-Appellee, v No. 222567 Wayne Circuit Court Family Division LC No. 97-357991 MICHELLE LYNN BARKOW MCQUEEN, Respondent, and SEAN DALE MCQUEEN, Respondent-Appellant. Before: Murphy, P.J., and Kelly and Talbot, JJ. MEMORANDUM. Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from the family court’s order terminating his parental rights to the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i), (g) and (j); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(c)(i), (g) and (j). We affirm. This case is being decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E). The family court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination were established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445 NW2d 161 (1989). Further, respondent-appellant failed to show that that termination of his parental rights was clearly not in the children’s best interests. Pursuant to MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5) termination of parental rights was required unless the court found that termination -1­ was clearly not in t e children’s best interest. In re Trejo, ___ Mich ___; ___ NW2d ___ (No. h 112528, issued 7/5/2000), slip op p 27. On this record, we do not conclude that the court’s finding was clearly erroneous or that termination was clearly not in the children’s best interest. Accordingly, the court did not err in terminating respondent’s parental right to the children. Id. Affirmed. /s/ William B. Murphy /s/ Michael J. Kelly /s/ Michael J. Talbot -2­

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.