IN RE THOMAS, MCMILLIN & HIGHTOWER MINORS, ET AL

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS In the Matter of LAKEADRA THOMAS, BARTHOLOMEW McMILLIN, MARIO HIGHTOWER, HENTONY HIGHTOWER, VERTWAN HIGHTOWER, DEVON HIGHTOWER, DONTAYVIEN JACKSON, TRAVARIUS CARTER, AND DOROTHY LIPSEY, Minors. FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY, UNPUBLISHED June 30, 2000 Petitioner-Appellee, v No. 223823 9th Circuit Court Family Division LC No. 93-000075-NA CELINDA LIPSEY, Respondent-Appellant, and HENRY COVINGTON, Respondent. Before: Smolenski, P.J., and Zahra and Collins, JJ. MEMORANDUM. Respondent Celinda Lipsey appeals as of right the termination of her parental rights to the nine minor children pursuant to MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i) and (g); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(c)(i) and (g). We affirm. The court did not clearly err in finding that §§ 19b(3)(c)(i) and (g) were established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445 NW2d 161 (1989). Moreover, respondent failed to show that termination of her parental rights was clearly not in the -1­ children’s best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5). Therefore, -2­ the court did not err in terminating her parental rights to the children. In re Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, 472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997). Affirmed. /s/ Michael R. Smolenski /s/ Brian K. Zahra /s/ Jeffrey G. Collins -3­

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.