IN RE CHAMBERS/GRANGER-CHAMBERS;MINORS

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS In the Matter of CHANEL JOSEY CHAMBERS, CHANTEY JOYCE CHAMBERS and SAMUEL GRANGER-CHAMBERS, JR., Minors. FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY, UNPUBLISHED April 18, 2000 Petitioner-Appellee, v LATONIA ANDREA CHAMBERS, LATONIA ANDRIA CHAMBERS, a/k/a No. 218688 Wayne Circuit Court Family Division LC No. 85-251864 Respondent-Appellant, and SAMUEL GRANGER and LEROY KIMBROUGH, Respondents. Before: Gribbs, P.J., and Doctoroff and T. L. Ludington*, JJ. MEMORANDUM. Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from the family court order terminating her parental rights to the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(g), (i) and (j); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(g), (i) and (j). We affirm. The written report and recommendation of the family court referee contains sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law to satisfy MCR 5.974(G). Also, the family court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination were established by clear and convincing evidence. * Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment. -1­ MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445 NW2d 161 (1989). Further, respondent­ appellant failed to show that termination of her parental rights was clearly not in the children’s best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5); In re Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, 472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997). Thus, the family court did not err in terminating respondent­ appellant’s parental rights to the children. Id. Affirmed. /s/ Roman S. Gribbs /s/ Martin M. Doctoroff /s/ Thomas L. Ludington -2­

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.