IN RE CHAMBERS/GRANGER-CHAMBERS;MINORS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of CHANEL JOSEY CHAMBERS,
CHANTEY JOYCE CHAMBERS and SAMUEL
GRANGER-CHAMBERS, JR., Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
April 18, 2000
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
LATONIA
ANDREA
CHAMBERS,
LATONIA ANDRIA CHAMBERS,
a/k/a
No. 218688
Wayne Circuit Court
Family Division
LC No. 85-251864
Respondent-Appellant,
and
SAMUEL GRANGER and
LEROY KIMBROUGH,
Respondents.
Before: Gribbs, P.J., and Doctoroff and T. L. Ludington*, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from the family court order terminating her parental
rights to the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(g), (i) and (j); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(g), (i)
and (j). We affirm.
The written report and recommendation of the family court referee contains sufficient findings of
fact and conclusions of law to satisfy MCR 5.974(G). Also, the family court did not clearly err in
finding that the statutory grounds for termination were established by clear and convincing evidence.
* Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.
-1
MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445 NW2d 161 (1989). Further, respondent
appellant failed to show that termination of her parental rights was clearly not in the children’s best
interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5); In re Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470,
472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997). Thus, the family court did not err in terminating respondent
appellant’s parental rights to the children. Id.
Affirmed.
/s/ Roman S. Gribbs
/s/ Martin M. Doctoroff
/s/ Thomas L. Ludington
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.