IN RE HARRIS MINORS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of DONALD DEANTE HARRIS and
DEMETRIUS DONTAE HARRIS, Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
November 30, 1999
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
No. 216433
Wayne Circuit Court
Family Division
LC No. 97-351098
RAQUEL LASHANNON MCLEAN,
Respondent-Appellant,
and
DONALD HARRIS,
Respondent.
Before: Jansen, P.J., and Hoekstra and J. R. Cooper*, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from a family court order terminating her parental
rights to the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i), (g), and (j); MSA
27.3178(598.19b)(3)(c)(i), (g), and (j). We affirm.
Only one statutory ground is required to terminate parental rights. In re Huisman, 230 Mich
App 372, 384-385; 584 NW2d 349 (1998). Here, the family court did not clearly err in finding that
§§ 19b(3)(c)(i) and (g) were both established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re
Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445 NW2d 161 (1989). Accordingly, we need not decide whether
termination was also proper under § 19b(3)(j). In re Huisman, supra. Because respondent-appellant
failed to show that termination was clearly not in the children’s best interests, MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA
* Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.
-1
27.3178(598.19b)(5), the family court did not err in terminating her parental rights to the children. In re
Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, 472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997).
Affirmed.
/s/ Kathleen Jansen
/s/ Joel P. Hoekstra
/s/ Jessica R. Cooper
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.