IN RE DONTAYE MILLER MINOR

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS In the Matter of DONTAYE MILLER, CECELIA CLARK, TYRELL CLARK and ANDREW CLARK, Minors. FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY, UNPUBLISHED October 26, 1999 Petitioner-Appellee, v LAREESE CATRINA POWELL and ERIC MILLER, Nos. 213542;213733 Genesee Circuit Court Family Division LC No. 96-105777 NA Respondents-Appellants, and TYRELL CLARK, Respondent. Before: Griffin, P.J., and Zahra and S.L. Pavlich*, JJ. MEMORANDUM. Respondents-appellants appeal as of right from the family court orders terminating their parental rights to the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i) and (g); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(c)(i) and (g). We affirm. The family court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination were established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445 NW2d 161 (1989). Further, respondents-appellants failed to show that termination of their parental rights was clearly not in the children's best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5); In re Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, 472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997). Thus, the family court did not err in terminating respondents-appellants’ parental rights to the children. * Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment. -1­ Affirmed. /s/ Richard Allen Griffin /s/ Brian K. Zahra /s/ Scott L. Pavlich -2­

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.