IN RE WILLIAMS/GRANT MINORS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of SHAWN AMAUUD WILLIAMS,
AUDREY DANIELLE WILLIAMS, TERRENCE
DEVON
WILLIAMS,
KEANU
CLIFTON
WILLIAMS, RENALDO RAMONE GRANT and
LESLIE LASALLE WILLIAMS, Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
April 2, 1999
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
No. 210270
Wayne County Circuit Court
Juvenile Division
LC No. 95-334396
ARMADA JOREEN WILLIAMS,
Respondent-Appellant,
and
DENNIS NEWSOME,
Respondent.
Before: McDonald, P.J., and Hood and Doctoroff, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from the juvenile court orders terminating her parental
rights to the minor children. We affirm.
Although the order terminating parental rights does not specify the statutory basis for
termination, there was clear and convincing evidence to support termination under each of the requested
statutory grounds, namely, MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i), (g) and (j); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(c)(i), (g)
and (j). MCR 5.974(I), In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445 NW2d 161 (1989). Further, the
-1
juvenile court did not clearly err in its determination that termination of respondent-appellant’s parental
was in the children’s best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5); In re HallSmith, 222 Mich App 470; 564 NW2d 156 (1997). Thus, the juvenile court did not err in terminating
respondent-appellant’s parental rights to the children.
Affirmed.
/s/ Gary R. McDonald
/s/ Harold Hood
/s/ Martin M. Doctoroff
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
