IN RE NICHOLSON/CAUDLE NICHOLSON MINORS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of WILLIAM HARRIS
NICHOLSON, SEY'QUAN CAUDLENICHOLSON, and JAZMEN NICHOLSON, Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
March 30, 1999
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
No. 210822
Wayne Circuit Court
Family Division
LC No. 96-339562
SHIRLEY NICHOLSON,
Respondent-Appellant,
and
WILLIAM CAUDLE,
Respondent.
Before: O’Connell, P.J., and Jansen and Collins, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from the family court order terminating her parental
rights to the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(a)(ii), (c)(i) and (g); MSA
27.3178(598.19b)(3)(a)(ii), (c)(i) and (g). We affirm. 1
The family court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination were
established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445
NW2d 161 (1989). Further, respondent-appellant failed to show that termination of her parental rights
was “clearly not” in the children's best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5); In
re Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, 472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997). Thus, the family court did not
err in terminating respondent-appellant's parental rights to the children.
-1
Affirmed.
/s/ Peter D. O’Connell
/s/ Kathleen Jansen
/s/ Jeffrey G. Collins
1
William Caudle, the father of minors William and Sey'Quan, has not appealed the termination of his
parental rights.
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
