IN RE HOLLIMAN/GENTRY MINORS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of CARNELL EDWARD
HOLLIMAN, LAVELL COLUMBUS
HOLLIMAN, DEON LA'RON GENTRY, and
NARKIESHA JOHNAE GENTRY, Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
March 26, 1999
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
DEBRA ANN GENTRY, a/k/a DEBORAH ANN
GENTRY,
No. 212174
Wayne Juvenile Court
LC No. 84-243617
Respondent-Appellant,
and
CARNELL HOLLIMAN,
Respondent.
Before: O’Connell, P.J., and Jansen and Collins, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from the juvenile court order terminating her parental
rights to the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i), (g), (h), (i) and (j); MSA
27.3178(598.19b)(3)(c)(i), (g), (h), (i) and (j). We affirm. 1 This case is being decided without oral
argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).
Respondent-appellant challenges the termination of her parental rights under § 19(b)(3)(h) only.
Because only one statutory ground is necessary to terminate parental rights, In re McIntyre, 192 Mich
App 47, 50; 480 NW2d 293 (1991), and because respondent-appellant does not challenge the
termination of her parental rights under the remaining four statutory grounds, i.e., §§ 19(b)(3)(c)(i), (g),
-1
(i) and (j), respondent-appellant is not entitled to appellate relief. In re JS and SM, 231 Mich App 92,
98; 585 NW2d 326 (1998); Roberts & Son Contracting, Inc v North Oakland Development Corp,
163 Mich App 109, 113; 413 NW2d 744 (1987).
Affirmed.
/s/ Peter D. O’Connell
/s/ Kathleen Jansen
/s/ Jeffrey G. Collins
1
The fathers of the minor children have not appealed the termination of their parental rights.
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
