IN RE MITCHELL LEE WARE MINOR
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
__________________________________________
In the Matter of MITCHELL LEE WARE, Minor.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
March 19, 1999
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
ETHEL LEYENDECKER,
No. 211962
St. Clair Circuit Court
Family Division
LC No. 95-000255
Respondent-Appellant.
Before: O’Connell, P.J. and Jansen and Collins, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from a family court order terminating her parental
rights to the minor child pursuant to MCL 712A.19b(3)(b)(ii), (c)(i), (g), and (j); MSA
27.3178(598.19b)(3)(b)(ii), (c)(i), (g), and (j). We affirm. This case is being decided without oral
argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).
The family court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory ground for termination under §
19b(3)(g) was established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich
331, 337; 445 NW2d 161 (1989). Further, respondent-appellant failed to show that termination of her
parental rights was clearly not in the child’s best interests.
MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA
27.3178(598.19b)(5). Thus, the court did not err in terminating respondent-appellant’s parental rights
to the child. In re Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, 472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997).
Affirmed.
/s/ Peter D. O’Connell
/s/ Kathleen Jansen
/s/ Jeffrey G. Collins
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.