IN RE BEACH & ROHM MINORS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of DANIELLE BEACH, MICAH
ROHM, CHRISTOPHER ROHM, and MISTY
ROHM, Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
February 26, 1999
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
No. 210867
Muskegon Circuit Court
Family Division
LC No. 96-022954 NA
SHEILA BEACH,
Respondent-Appellant,
and
MICHAH DANIEL ROHM,
Respondent.
Before: McDonald, P.J., and Hood and Doctoroff, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from a trial court order terminating her parental rights
to the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(c)(i) and (g); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(c)(i) and (g).
We affirm.
The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination were
established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445
NW2d 161 (1989). Further, the trial court did not err in terminating respondent-appellant’s parental
rights, inasmuch as respondent-appellant failed to demonstrate that termination of her parental rights was
“clearly not” in the children’s best interests. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5); In re
Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, 472; 564 NW2d 156 (1997).
Affirmed.
-1
/s/ Gary R. McDonald
/s/ Harold Hood
/s/ Martin M. Doctoroff
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
