PEOPLE OF MI V MARIO A MOORE
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,
UNPUBLISHED
October 2, 1998
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v
No. 200543
Genesee Circuit Court
LC No. 92-047427 FC
MARIO A. MOORE,
Defendant-Appellant.
Before: Whitbeck, P.J., and McDonald and T. G. Hicks*, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Defendant appeals by right from his resentencing to six to fifteen years’ imprisonment for
involuntary manslaughter, MCL 750.321; MSA 28.533. We affirm.
Defendant pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter, and was initially sentenced to 7-1/2 to 15
years’ imprisonment. This Court remanded for resentencing before a different judge, based on the
impermissible consideration of information obtained in violation of defendant’s right to remain silent.
People v Moore, unpublished memorandum opinion, decided May 5, 1995 (Docket No. 162220).
This Court also found that the court failed to strike certain portions of the presentence investigation
report after agreeing to do so. On resentencing, the offending portions were to be stricken.
The trial court properly complied with this Court’s directive in resentencing defendant. At
resentencing, defense counsel agreed that the presentence report had been modified in accordance with
this Court’s direction. Any objections to the accuracy of the modified presentence report have not been
preserved for appeal. MCR 6.429(C); People v Bailey (On Remand), 218 Mich App 645, 647; 554
NW2d 391 (1996). The trial court did not improperly rely on stricken material in imposing sentence.
The trial court did not agree to ignore defendant’s juvenile record, and it was not required to do so
where defendant was represented by counsel in the juvenile adjudication. See People v Ristich, 169
Mich App 754; 426 NW2d 801 (1988).
Affirmed.
* Circuit judge, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment.
-1
/s/ William C. Whitbeck
/s/ Gary R. McDonald
/s/ Timothy G. Hicks
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.