IN RE DUIGNAN & HALSEY MINORS
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
In the Matter of AMANDA DUIGNAN, EUGENE
HALSEY, CORBIN HALSEY, MEGAN HALSEY,
and NICHOLAS HALSEY, Minors.
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
September 11, 1998
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
No. 206703
Jackson Juvenile Court
LC No. 97-019286
BARBARA HALSEY WARD,
Respondent-Appellant,
and
KEVIN DUIGNAN,
Respondent.
Before: Holbrook, Jr., P.J., and Wahls and Cavanagh, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent mother appeals as of right from a juvenile court order terminating her parental rights
to the minor children under MCL 712A.19b(3)(g) and (j); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(3)(g) and (j). We
affirm.
After reviewing the record, we conclude that the juvenile court did not err in finding that the
statutory grounds for termination were established by clear and convincing evidence. In re Miller, 433
Mich 331, 337; 445 NW2d 161 (1989); In re Hamlet (After Remand), 225 Mich App 505, 515;
571 NW2d 750 (1997). We also reject respondent’s contention that the juvenile court improperly
shifted the burden of proof from petitioner to respondent to show that termination is not in the best
interests of the children. The court’s finding merely indicates that respondent failed to put forth evidence
-1
from which the court could conclude that the presumption in favor of termination had been overcome,
and that termination is not clearly in the best interests of the
-2
children. MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3179(598.19b)(5); In re Hamlet (After Remand), supra at
505; In re Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, 472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997). We conclude that this
finding is supported by the record. Accordingly, termination of respondent-appellant’s parental rights
was proper. In re Hall-Smith, supra at 473.
Affirmed.
/s/ Donald E. Holbrook, Jr.
/s/ Myron H. Wahls
/s/ Mark J. Cavanagh
-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.