BRENDA WIERSMA V GEORGE HANNA

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS BRENDA WIERSMA, UNPUBLISHED September 11, 1998 Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 202425 Ottawa Circuit Court LC No. 96-024428 NO GEORGE HANNA, LINDA HANNA, and JOE HANNA, Defendants-Appellees. Before: Holbrook, Jr., P.J., and Wahls and Cavanagh, JJ. MEMORANDUM. Plaintiff appeals as of right from the summary dismissal of her premise liability action pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10). We affirm. Plaintiff challenges the propriety of the trial court’s grant of summary disposition. The trial court relied on deposition excerpts provided by the parties when it decided the merits of defendants’ motions. These deposition excerpts were not provided to this Court. Because plaintiff has failed to provide the documentation considered by the trial court as required by MCR 7.210 and because any determination of the merits of plaintiff’s appellate challenges would necessitate a review of this documentation, plaintiff’s failure to provide this documentation waives appellate review of her challenge. People v Anderson, 209 Mich App 527, 535; 531 NW2d 780 (1995); Myers v Jarnac, 189 Mich App 436, 444; 474 NW2d 302 (1991). Affirmed. /s/ Donald E. Holbrook, Jr. /s/ Myron H. Wahls /s/ Mark J. Cavanagh -1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.