IN RE SHAQUITA LAYCHANETTE SMITH MINOR
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
_____________________________________
In the Matter of SHAQUITA LAYCHANETTE
SMITH, Minor
_____________________________________
FAMILY INDEPENDENCE AGENCY,
UNPUBLISHED
September 30, 1997
Petitioner-Appellee,
v
ANITA SMITH, a/k/a LANITA SIMONE SMITH,
No. 200269
Wayne Juvenile Court
LC No. 94-321789
Respondent-Appellant,
and
KEN DUMAS, a/k/a KENNETH DUMAS,
a/k/a PETER DUMAS,
Respondent.
____________________________________
Before: Markey, P.J., and Neff and Smolenski, JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Respondent-appellant appeals as of right from the juvenile court order terminating her parental
rights to the minor child under MCL 712A.19b(3)(a)(ii), (c)(i), (g), and (j); MSA
27.3178(598.19b)(3)(a)(ii), (c)(i), (g), and (j). We affirm.
The juvenile court did not err in finding that the statutory grounds for termination were
established by clear and convincing evidence. MCR 5.974(I); In re Miller, 433 Mich 331, 337; 445
NW2d 161 (1989); In re Hall-Smith, 222 Mich App 470, 472-473; 564 NW2d 156 (1997).
Moreover, once a statutory ground for termination has been met by clear and convincing
evidence, MCL 712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5) requires a parent to put forth at least some
-1
evidence that termination is clearly not in the child’s best interest. In re Hall-Smith, supra. Absent any
evidence from the parent addressing this issue, termination of parental rights is mandatory. Id. In this
case, respondent-appellant failed to put forth any evidence from which the juvenile court could conclude
that termination was clearly not in the minor child’s best interest. Hence, the court’s decision to
terminate respondent-appellant’s parental rights was in conformity with the requirements of MCL
712A.19b(5); MSA 27.3178(598.19b)(5).
Affirmed.
/s/ Jane E. Markey
/s/ Janet T. Neff
/s/ Michael R. Smolenski
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.