PEOPLE OF MI V ANTOINE LAMAR WALLACE
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COURT OF APPEALS
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,
UNPUBLISHED
March 25, 1997
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v
No. 193843
Ingham Circuit Court
LC No. 95-069464-FC
ANTOINE LAMAR WALLACE,
Defendant-Appellant.
Before: D.F. Walsh,* P.J., and R.P. Griffin** and W.P. Cynar,* JJ.
MEMORANDUM.
Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant pleaded guilty to second-degree murder, MCL
750.317; MSA 28.549, conspiracy to commit breaking and entering, MCL 750.157(a); MSA
28.354(1) and MCL 750.110; MSA 28.305, and carrying a concealed weapon, MCL 750.227; MSA
28.424. For those respective convictions, he was sentenced to fifteen to forty years’ imprisonment, ten
to fifteen years’ imprisonment, and three to five years’ imprisonment. He appeals as of right. We
affirm. This case has been decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E)(1)(b).
Having reviewed the record, we hold that the prosecutor did not violate the plea agreement.
People v Rodriguez, 192 Mich App 1, 5; 480 NW2d 287 (1991); People v Nixten, 183 Mich App
95, 98-99; 454 NW2d 160 (1990).
In imposing the sentences, the trial court took into account all the necessary factors and the
additional information brought to its attention by defendant. People v Coles, 417 Mich 523, 549-550;
339 NW2d 440 (1983). The trial court did not abuse its discretion in sentencing defendant. People v
Cervantes, 448 Mich 620, 626-627; 532 NW2d 831 (1995). Defendant’s sentences are
*Former Court of Appeals judges, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment pursuant to
Administrative Order 1996-10.
**Former Supreme Court justice, sitting on the Court of Appeals by assignment pursuant to
Administrative Order 1996-10.
-1
proportionate to the seriousness of the circumstances surrounding the offenses and the offender.
People v Milbourn, 435 Mich 630, 635-636; 461 NW2d 1 (1990).
Affirmed.
/s/ Daniel F. Walsh
/s/ Robert P. Griffin
/s/ Walter P. Cynar
-2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
