Lisa Whittington VS Walmart, Inc. and Adam Bourgeois

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT LISA 2021 NO. WHITTINGTON CW 0745 VERSUS WALMART INC. AND ADAM NOVM4BER 02 , 2021 BOURGEOIS In Re: Walmart Inc., Judicial for applying Parish Court, District 23rd writs, supervisory No. Ascension, of 128735. BEFORE: GUIDRY, GRANTED. WRIT the denying defendant, direct entrustment, of the alleged Company, 2( lst denied, employer, the course Walmart and the Accordingly, defendant, Inc., United Cir. 2020 303 for negligence partial is supervision the and 2612903, the all La. writ case, was in accident. filed claims for Inc. are 4, this employee of and retention In judgment summary Walmart Insurance WL 4251974, * 1038. time granted against Fire time 2019- 1633 ( its that at the the at 2019 WL So. 3d admitted Inc., States White, v. for that admitted 6/ 13/ 19), Elee employment motion training, v. So. 3d _, of Walmart independent hiring, scope employment of while employer has 11/ 10/ 20), La. employer the against by cannot hiring, negligent an scope curiam); 7/ 24/ 20), _ Cir. as ruling filed plaintiff employer lst App. per 2020- 01048 ( the and Wheeler La. unpublished) ( App. course conduct. 2018- 1422 ( the after the A against claims maintaining in was such etc., 2021 judgment reversed. claims 3, June s summary hereby supervision, liability vicarious is Inc., JJ. court' partial negligence simultaneously employee for motion CHUTZ, district The Walmart maintain AND HOLDRIDGE, by of negligent dismissed. JMG WRC Holdridge, First Insurance WL J., 2019- 1633 ( 4251974, * 2( La. 4, unpublished) ( 1st App. writ denied, Cir. OF APPEAL, DEPUTY FOR CL RK THE FIRST OF CIRCUIT COURT COURT am constrained Wheeler La. per App. v. lst curiam); 7/ 24/ 20), _ 2020- 01048 ( 1038. COURT of 2018- 1422 ( Company, 2612903, * I concurs. jurisprudence Circuit La. Cir. and follow to United States 6/ 13/ 19), Elee So. 3d 11/ 10/ 20), the Fire 2019 White, v. 2020 303 WL So. 3d

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.