Ellen Sonnier and Mark Sonnier on behalf of Talon Sonnier, a minor child VS Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., Wayne James Agnelly and GEICO Casualty Company
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT ELLEN SONNIER AND MARK SONNIER ON SONNIER, TOYOTA BEHALF OF A MINOR MOTOR AND JAMES NEWMAN OF In Re: Farm Court, for raising allow tort those who to create Assn So. 3d 676, ex v. The in of question in that of of entirety is intent obvious of the Relator' s La. R. S. action to against the Vehicle Health See also rules Hosp. is 15), 168 Ass' n 169 laws the terms v. So. 3d determined other on of Louisiana 12/ 30/ 14), 5/ 1/ law Sys., legislature the Cir. all JJ. claims La. a of of Louisiana and PENZATO, employing 1 App. 46207. action. whether nom., AND Ochsner 581, 2015- 0215 ( c/ w right action. La. intent of and placing a construction consistent with the express matter the sub its v. District denying injury 579, determine Ins., and law right Anderson right in provisions So. 3d to denied Dep' t the subject with See CHUTZ private personal 2013- 0579 ( writ no a Company, Judicial 46177 No. erred the 172 private meaning of pursue Law. a court violate State, 686, rel. considering and to Coupee, create interpretation State same not Insurance 18th HIGGINBOTHAM, objection 07/ 01/ 14), La. statutory 372, " the Title of Pointe trial allegedly 2013- 2970 ( Hosp. The victims Certificate intended of McDONALD, does seq. Automobile supervisory writs, C. J., GRANTED. et Mutual Parish WHIPPLE, 32: 701, MOTORS AL applying exception 2018 COMPANY ET State WRIT APRIL AGNELLY DIAMOND LLC, BEFORE: 6, V. WITH V. WALKER, 0199 U. S. A., CASUALTY CONSOLIDATED AMY CHILD SALES, WAYNE GEICO CW CORPORATION, TOYOTA MOTOR INC., 2018 NO. TALON by the on provision of the law legislature in enacting it." Consequently, that portion of the trial court' s judgment, dated 2018, January 9, denying State Farm Mutual Insurance Company' s exception raising the objection of no right of action is hereby reversed, State and Farm is dismissed as a from party this proceeding. JMM TMH WRC AHP Whipple timely 4- 3. date written signing, ambiguous to dissents to provide Uniform under Pursuant return sent C. J., failed Relator to was and the the does The Clerk not parties. on record of this does Court' s expressly This not this stamp state court the cannot contain on intent, issuance a the date is Rule Appeal, of court' s writ. application of notice not the consider writ Courts Relator' s days of would that Louisiana of order within " 30 judgment..." and Rules the and proof of the its notice of judgment is the determine notice when was the STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT Ppge 2 judgment was " issued" and, as application was timely filed. COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT E JPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT a result, whether Relator' s writ
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
