Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Partington

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-11-0000162 09-FEB-2012 09:13 AM SCAD-11-0000162 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner, vs. EARLE A. PARTINGTON, Respondent. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING (ODC 10-079-8913) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE SUSPENSION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ., and Intermediate Court of Appeals Chief Judge Nakamura, in place of Acoba, J., recused) Upon consideration of Respondent Earle A. Partington’s motion to vacate his suspension and for other relief, the arguments therein, the appended exhibits, the opposition to the motion filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel and the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is denied in all respects. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, February 9, 2012. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ James E. Duffy, Jr. /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Craig H. Nakamura

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.