Doe v. Doe
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NO. 24639 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I No. 24639 JANE DOE, Petitioner-Appellant, vs. JOHN DOE, Defendant-Appellee. (FC-P NO. 93-0625) ----------------------------------------------------------------No. 24657 JANE DOE, Petitioner-Appellant, vs. JOHN DOE, Defendant-Appellee. (FC-P NO. 93-0925) APPEAL FROM THE FAMILY COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (FC-P NOS. 93-0625 & 93-0925) ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PETITIONER-APPELLANT S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ.) Upon consideration of petitioner-appellant Jane Doe s motion for reconsideration, filed December 17, 2004, the papers in support thereof and in opposition thereto, and the records and files herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted, in part, to correct a typographical error on the fifth line from the bottom of page 2 of this court s summary disposition order, filed November 16, 2004, to wit: should read 583-2(10). the reference to HRS ยง 583-2(1) The Clerk of the Court is directed to -1- make the foregoing correction in the original summary disposition order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion is denied in all other respects. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, January 24, 2005. Paul A. Lynch and Steven J. Kim (of Lynch Ichida Thompson Kim & Hirota), for plaintiff-appellant Chunmay Chang, for defendant-appellee -2-
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
